14 Ga. App. 665 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1914
1. The plaintiff in error was aceirsed of larceny from the house, and the nature of the testimony against him required, upon his part, a satisfactory explanation of his possession of the property alleged to have been stolen. _The court correctly permitted proof of the state
2. Except as stated above, the trial was free from error.
Judgment reversed.