121 Iowa 597 | Iowa | 1902
We have not taken the time to discuss all the assignments, but have considered all that seem to us to have any possible merit. The result is that the judgment of the lower court is aeeiRMED.
Supplemental Opinion, October 29, 1903.
A petition for rehearing was sustained, and the cause is now before us upon resubmission. The opinion sufficiently states the case. —’Reversed.
Other questions argued are not likely to arise upon a •new trial, and need not be here noticed. It follows from what has been said above that a new trial should have been awarded plaintiff, and, that such may obtain, the judgment of the trial court is.REVERSED.