History
  • No items yet
midpage
57 N.Y.2d 731
NY
1982

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for a review of the facts and the exercise of discretion, if appropriate. CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 4) vests a court with broad discretion in considering whether to dismiss an action on the ground that another action is pending between the same parties on the same cause of action. Thus, it was error for the Appellate Division to have reversed, on the law, the lower court’s exercise of discretion in deciding the instant motion.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.

Case Details

Case Name: Whitney v. Whitney
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 9, 1982
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 731; 440 N.E.2d 1324; 454 N.Y.S.2d 977; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3657
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Whitney v. Whitney, 57 N.Y.2d 731