263 F. 477 | D.C. Cir. | 1920
This case is here on a writ of error to the Police Court. Whiting was convicted of violating the Act of Congress of March 3, 1917, known as the Reed Amendment (39 Stat. 1069, 40 Stat. 1151), by bringing into the District of Columbia intoxicating liquors. Several errors are assigned by him, but we pass upon only one.
[ 1 ] The defendant contended that the liquor found in his possession was being transported by him through the District to his home in Virginia for his personal use. Upon this point the court instructed the jury as follows:
“In this ease there is a large number of half-pint bottles of whisky, to wit, 310, and it is not improper for me to call your attention to the fact that, in practically all bootlegging cases which como into this court, the whisky found in possession of the defendants is in half-pint bottles, and it is proper for you to take that fact into consideration in determining whether this whisky was being brought into the District for the purpose of being sold, or whether it was being carried into Virginia to the homo of the defendant for his personal use.”
There was no evidence whatever “that in practically all bootlegging cases” which came before the court the whisky found in possession of the defendants was in half-pint bottles, yet the court instructed the
The judgment is reversed, with directions to grant a new trial.
Reversed.