Whitehurst v. Old Dominion Univ

97-1550 | 4th Cir. | Nov 13, 1997

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1550 ROBERT H. WHITEHURST, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY; ANNE B. SHUMADINE, Rector of Old Dominion University; ANTHONY C. PAIGE, Reverend, Board of Visitors for Old Dominion University; E. L. HAMM, JR., Board of Visitors for Old Dominion University; A. M. WHITTMORE, Board of Visitors for Old Dominion University; LINDSAY L. RETTIE, Dean, College of Health Sciences; BRENDA S. NICHOLS, Dean, Nursing School of Old Dominion University; BETTY L. MARTIN, Adjunct Faculty, Old Dominion University; CARMELITA PIMEDA, Chesapeake Gen- eral Hospital; CHESAPEAKE GENERAL HOSPITAL, Donald S. Buckley, president, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1179-2) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert H. Whitehurst, Appellant Pro Se. Alison Paige Landry, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Patrick B. Kelly, OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY, Norfolk, Virginia; Peter Stevenson Lake, John Garrett Kemper, HEILIG, MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Nor- folk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Whitehurst v. Old Dominion Univ., No. CA-96-1179-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1997). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2