History
  • No items yet
midpage
Whitehurst v. Hathorn
128 Ga. 406
Ga.
1907
Check Treatment
Fish, C. J.

The only issue raised to the return of proeessioners being whether a line run and marked by them, was “the true original land line,” and the evidence on the trial being amply sufficient to authorize the finding in the affirmative, the refusal of a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence was not error-

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Processioning. Before Judge Lewis. Wilkinson superior court. July 9, 1906. F. Chambers & Son, for plaintiff in error. Lindsey & Carswell, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Whitehurst v. Hathorn
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 17, 1907
Citation: 128 Ga. 406
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.