History
  • No items yet
midpage
63 F. App'x 175
4th Cir.
2003

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

David L. Whitehead appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc., 233 F.Supp.2d 715 (D.Md.2002). We deny Whitehead’s motions for an evidentiary hearing, for injunctive relief, and to strike the Appellee’s informal brief, and dispense *176with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 21, 2003
Citations: 63 F. App'x 175; No. 03-1148
Docket Number: No. 03-1148
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In