History
  • No items yet
midpage
Whitehall v. Smith
24 Ill. 166
Ill.
1860
Check Treatment
Catón, C. J.

It was too late to take the objection to the form of the verdict. It was cured by the statute of Jeofails. But the proof of the loss of the affidavit and warrant was insufficient to admit secondary evidence of their contents. The affidavit was made before Justice Ayers, and the warrant issued by him. On some occasion, he went to Virginia, and left a part of his papers with the witness, Bryant, and a part with one Joiner. Bryant swore they were not in the box of papers left with him, nor were they pinned into Ayers’ docket, which he was in the habit of doing with papers relating to a cause. If it was impossible to get the testimony of Ayers to prove the loss of these papers, there is no excuse shown for not producing Joiner, or showing by some one else that they were not with those papers left with him. This was not done.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

, Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Whitehall v. Smith
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1860
Citation: 24 Ill. 166
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.