History
  • No items yet
midpage
White v. State
114 Ala. 10
Ala.
1896
Check Treatment
McCLELLAN, J. —

The city court erred in excluding from the jury proposed testimony going to show that the general character of State’s witness, Barnes, was bad. McCutchen v. Loggins, 109 Ala. 457, 465 ; Rhea v. State, 100 Ala. 119, 122, and cases there cited.

The other exceptions reserved on the trial are patently without merit.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: White v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 15, 1896
Citation: 114 Ala. 10
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.