White v. StateWhite v. State
Ronald C. White appeals from an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Based on the State‘s partial confession of error, we reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand for further proceedings.
We affirm the remaining sentences, as the unlawful sentence on count two does not impact upon the remaining legal sentences. See Davis v. Wainwright, 408 So.2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (improper mitigation of sentence as to one count did not taint sentences as to other counts). The remaining sentences were lawfully entered pursuant to the plea agreement. See Quarterman v. State, 527 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 1988) (plea bargain sufficient basis for departure sentence); Bush v. State, 596 So.2d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 604 So.2d 486 (Fla. 1992) (same).
Finally, the trial court properly rejected defendant‘s claim that his conviction and sentences violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. Those claims should have been raised in defendant‘s two prior motions for postconviction relief under
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded for correction as to the sentence on count two only.