History
  • No items yet
midpage
White v. State
2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2208
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2002
|
Check Treatment
90 S.W.3d 498 (2002)

Cornell WHITE, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. ED 80474.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

November 5, 2002.

Douglas R. Hoff, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before PAUL J. SIMON, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., J. and KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Cornell White, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: White v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 5, 2002
Citation: 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2208
Docket Number: ED 80474
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.