White v. Sanders

32 Me. 188 | Me. | 1850

Tenney, J.,

orally.—The instruction as to the demand was correct.

The defendants’ counsel requested certain instructions. But the mere knowledge by the plaintiffs of the sale to the defendants, and their receipt from Getchell of money on account of the goods, would not necessarily be a ratification. The modification of requested instruction was rightfully made by the Judge. Exceptions overruled.