White v. New York City Housing AuthorityWhite v. New York City Housing Authority
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about September 13, 2000, which, insofar as it is appealed from, denied defendant-appellant’s motion to strike the claim of inadequate lighting from plaintiffs bill of particulars, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion to strike plaintiff’s allegation of inadequate lighting granted. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about November 17, 2000, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff slipped and fell on stairs in a building owned and operated by defendant Housing Authority, the IAS court erred in denying defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s claim of inadequate lighting from the bill of particulars. The notice of claim and the complaint alleged that plaintiff was caused to slip and fall by a foreign substance on the stairwell. The poor lighting condition was raised for the first time in plaintiff’s bill of particulars, which was served over one year after the accident. Plaintiff’s new allegation was not within the scope of permissible corrections to the notice of claim covered by General Municipal Law § 50-e (6). Instead, this allegation created a new theory of liability. Any amendment that creates a new theory of liability is not within the statute’s purview (Olivera v City of New York,
We find that the IAS court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment since issues of fact as to notice still exist. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Andrias, Lerner and Mar-low, JJ.