White v. Dakin
70 N.H. 632
N.H.
1900
Check Treatment

There was no evidence to justify a finding of fraud. Such a conclusion would have been mere conjecture. Deschenes v. Railroad, 69 N.H. 285, 288, et seq. *Page 633

The testimony of the creditor was properly excluded. Although not a party of record, he was directly interested in the result of the appeal. Foster v. Ela, 69 N.H. 460.

Exceptions overruled.

YOUNG, J., did not sit: the others concurred.