History
  • No items yet
midpage
White v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
2009 Ark. 173
Ark.
2009
Check Treatment
300 S.W.3d 499 (2009)
2009 Ark. 173

Natasha WHITE, Appellant,
v.
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, minor child, Appellee.

No. 09-221.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

April 2, 2009.

Jesse L. Kearney, for appellant.

No response.

MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK

PER CURIAM.

Natasha White, by and through her attorney Jesse L. Kearney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk to accept the record and permission to file a belated brief. Attorney Kearney states in the motion that he is at fault for failing to perfect the appeal.

We now entertain motions for rule on clerk in appeals from termination of parental rights. See Moore v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 363 Ark. 205, 212 S.W.3d 1 (2005). We afford indigent parents in termination of parental rights actions similar protections afforded indigent criminal defendants. Latiolais v. Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs., 368 Ark. 381, 382, 246 S.W.3d 413 (2006). As attorney Kearney has admitted fault, we grant the motion for rule on clerk. See Moore, supra; McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Arkansas Supreme Court committee on Professional Conduct.

Case Details

Case Name: White v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Apr 2, 2009
Citation: 2009 Ark. 173
Docket Number: 09-221
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.