History
  • No items yet
midpage
Whitcomb v. Straw
60 N.H. 117
| N.H. | 1880
|
Check Treatment

An amendment increasing the ad damnum in a writ may be allowed, sometimes even after verdict. Taylor v. Jones, 42 N.H. 25. The reasons for permitting the reduction of the ad damnum are still stronger. The defendant cannot be *Page 118 harmed by such an amendment. He has a smaller claim to meet. The declaration is single, upon a single tort, and the part stricken out cannot be made the subject of a future action, for there can be but one recovery. The plaintiff could waive a part of his claim, and at the trial demand a smaller sum than he sued for, and the defendant cannot object to the plaintiff's making that demand of record, and becoming estopped from claiming more. The amount in controversy being reduced to $100, the case was properly referred.

Exceptions overruled.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Whitcomb v. Straw
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1880
Citation: 60 N.H. 117
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.