History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wheeler v. Salinger
33 Ga. App. 300
Ga. Ct. App.
1924
Check Treatment
Bell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) After verdict for the plaintiff for principal, interest, and attorney’s fees as sued for, the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and he excepted. The facts, in addition to those contained in the statement above, are sufficiently indicated in the headnotes. It is not deemed necessary to elaborate any of the rulings therein made.

Judgment affirmed on the main bill of exceptions; cross-bill dismissed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wheeler v. Salinger
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 17, 1924
Citation: 33 Ga. App. 300
Docket Number: 15832, 15833
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.