Appeal, No. 279 | Pa. | Apr 22, 1918
Opinion by
In this case plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant in an action to recover the difference between the amount defendant charged plaintiff for a loan and the amount due with interest computed at the rate of six per cent. The question raised involves the constitutionality of the Act of June 17,1915, P. L. 1012, and as that question is fully discussed and determined in Commonwealth v.' Puder, nothing additional need be added here.
The judgment is affirmed.