BRENT S. WEYHRAUCH., Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE et al., Defendants.
CASE NO. 3:26-cv-05284-DGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
April 29, 2026
David G. Estudillo
ORDER ON MOTION TO AUTHORIZE ALTERNATIVE SERVICE ON DEFENDANT JOHN DOE (DKT. NO. 7)
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for order authorizing alternative service on Defendant “John Doe.” (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff contends that despite “diligent investigation,” he has been unable to ascertain the identity or physical address of the individual operating LocateFamily.com. (Id. at 2.) According to Plaintiff, Defendant Doe “conceals his identity through multiple layers of anonymity” as he has no corporate registration in any jurisdiction, communicates exclusively through an anonymous email address, and operates under multiple addresses in at least five jurisdictions. (Id. at 2–3.) Plaintiff has submitted a “removal request,” engaged in multiple email exchanges with info@LocateFamily.com, sent a formal demand letter
Citing
Service of process upon any person who is subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state, as provided in this section, may be made by personally serving the defendant outside this state, as provided in [
Washington Revised Code § 4.28.180 ], with the same force and effect as though personally served within this state.
Ralph’s Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. Concord Concrete Pumps, Inc., 225 P.3d 1035, 1037 (Wash. App. 2010) (emphasis added).
- (1) by any internationally agreed means of service that is reasonably calculated to give notice, such as those authorized by the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents; [or]
- . . . .
- (3) by other means not prohibited by international agreement, as the court orders.
For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff’s motion for order authorizing alternative service (Dkt. No. 7) is DENIED.
Dated this 29th day of April, 2026.
David G. Estudillo
United States District Judge
