History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.
372 Pa. 250
Pa.
1953
Check Treatment

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal is by plaintiff from an order granting a new trial, the assigned reason being that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. President Judge Brown in his opinion reviewed the evidence at length. We are unable to discover any palpable abuse of discretion and therefore decline to disturb such exercise of discretion: Bellettiere v. Philadelphia, 367 Pa. 638, 81 A. 2d 857; Beal v. Reading Company, 370 Pa. 45, 87 A. 2d 214.

Order • affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Wexler v. Bonwit, Teller & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 5, 1953
Citation: 372 Pa. 250
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 249
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.