History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wetherington v. Cochran & Sons
56 S.E. 422
Ga.
1907
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

This was an action for damages on account of injuries received upon the part of the plaintiff by being struck and run over by certain mules, which the defendants caused to be driven along the street. When the charge of the court is considered in its entirety, there was no error in any of the excerpts from the same, upon which error was assigned, which requires a reversal of the judgment refusing to grant a new trial. The verdict for the defendants was supported by the evidence and approved by the presiding judge. We will not disturb his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Wetherington v. Cochran & Sons
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 17, 1907
Citation: 56 S.E. 422
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.