67 P.2d 505 | N.M. | 1937
This is the second appeal of this case. For the facts see our former opinion, Western Live Stock v. Bureau of Revenue,
The district court of Santa Fe county, following the directions of our mandate, duly entered an order sustaining defendants' demurrer. Thereupon plaintiffs filed a written declaration of inability to amend and of refusal to plead further. The district court then rendered judgment against the plaintiffs, dismissing their complaint with prejudice. They seek a review of that judgment by this appeal.
The matter is before us upon the former record and a new transcript supplementing same, showing the proceedings subsequent to mandate. The parties have stipulated that the briefs filed by counsel for the respective parties on the former appeal shall be considered by the court as their briefs on this appeal. We thus have before us the same question, presented on *289 the same record (with the addition of the above-mentioned proceedings subsequent to mandate contained in the new transcript) and the same briefs. Obviously, the issue thus presented is ruled and foreclosed by our decision on the former appeal. It follows that the judgment of the district court must be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
HUDSPETH, C.J., and SADLER, BRICE, and ZINN, JJ., concur.
BICKLEY, J., being absent, did not participate.