147 Ky. 489 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1912
Opinion op the Court by
Affirming.
On September 7, 1907, the Western Indemnity Company issued to George McCormick two policies ■each insuring his life in the sum of $1,000, for the benefit of his nephew, Clarence Bnpp, if living, otherwise for the benefit of his executors, in consideration of the sum of $54.76 to be paid annually. The premiums were paid during the life •of McCormick and this suit was brought by Clarence Bupp against the company to recover on each policy. The company entered a motion to quash the process; the motion was overruled. It then filed a general and special demurrer to the petition. The general demurrer was sustained, and the petition dismissed. From this judgment an appeal was taken by Bupp to this court. On the appeal it was held that Bupp though having no insurable interest in the life of his uncle, could recover on the policy. The judgment was reversed and the cause remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. (Rupp v. Western Life Indemnity Co., 138 Ky., 18.) On the return of the ca,se to the circuit court, the defendant filed an answer to which the ■circuit court sustained a demurrer and the defendant failing to plea further, the court entered judgment in
It is too late now to raise the question that the process was not properly served. This question should have been presented on the first appeal. On that appeal the case was heard here on the merits and it is too late after a reversal on the merits to raise any question as to the sufficiency of the process. (McDowell v. C., O. & S. W. R. R. Co., 90 Ky., 346; I. C. R. R. Co. v. Glover, 24 R., 1419.)
In' the answer the defendant pleaded that it was a corporation formed under the laws of Illinois, and that by the statute of Illinois it was prohibited from issuing a policy upon a life in which the beneficiary had no insurable interest. The section of the statute relied on is in these words:
“No corporation doing business of life insurance under this act shall issue a certificate of policy upon the life of any person more than sixty-five years of age, excepting in case of transfer of policy holders as provided herein, nor upon a life in which the beneficiary named has no insurable interest. Any assignment of the policy or certificate to a person having no insurable interest in the insured life shall render such policy or certificate void.”
The act referred to is entitled “An act to incorporate certain companies and to control such companies of this State and of other States doing business in this State * * * and fixing the punishment for violation of the provisions thereof.” We have examined the act with care and find that it not only contains a scheme for the incorporation of these companies and their management and supervision by the State, but also provides how actions against them are to be tried. To whom a policy of insurance may be assigned when the policy has been issued in Kentucky and the assignment is made in Kentucky may be regulated by the laws of Kentucky. The •statutes of one State ordinarily have no operation in another State. It is true that a corporation formed under the laws of one State has only the powers conferred upon it in the State of its origin, but when a foreign corporation is permitted by another State to come within it and make contracts, the State which thus gives its permission may regulate the validity of the contracts thus made. Upon an inspection of the whole act we are satisfied that the section above quoted was hot intended
When in a charter of an incorporated company restrictions are imposed as to the kind of business it may do, such limitations upon the power of the company ordinarily follow it wherever it goes, that is, when such a company comes into another State, it has only the powers which its charter confers. But that is not this case. The act in question is a general law regulating insurance companies and was evidently designed as a regulation of the business in the State of Illinois. It has no application to the business done in Kentucky. If this policy had been made payable simply to the executors of the insured and had afterward been assigned by him to his nephew, Clarence Bupp, it could hardly be maintained that the assignment being valid under the laws of Kentucky, could be held invalid because of the ■ statute of Illinois, and this being so, it is hard to see why the policy might not be made payable in the first place to the nephew, Clarence Bupp.
Judgment affirmed.
