History
  • No items yet
midpage
Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance
319 A.2d 732
N.J.
1974
Check Treatment
*153 Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Richard B. Holcombe, Alice Holcombe and Wilbur S. Holcombe v. The Continental Insurance Companies New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., Motor Club Fire & Casualty Co., Jackie W. Eisner, etc., and Elmer Richard Potent, Guardian Ad Litem for Richard M. Potent, an infant, Elmer Richard Potent and Charlotte Potent, individually, vs. Jackie W. Eisner, Haltie Eisner, Elmer Eisner, Sr., and Richard B. Holcombe, Sr., etc, 126 N. J. Super.

For reversal — Hone.

For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan and Pashman — 5.

Case Details

Case Name: Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 29, 1974
Citation: 319 A.2d 732
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.