History
  • No items yet
midpage
West Virginia CWP Fund v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
691 F. App'x 110
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before TRAXLER, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey R. Soukup, JACKSON KELLY PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky, for Petitioner. M. Patricia Smith, Solicitor of Labor, Maia S. Fisher, Associate Solicitor, Sean G. Bajkowski, Counsel for Appellate Litigation, Jeffrey S. Goldberg, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Carl Hostler, PRIM LAW FIRM, PLLC, Hurricane, West Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

West Virginia CWP Fund seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-944 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. W. Va. CWP Fund v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs , No. 15-0439-BLA (B.R.B. June 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: West Virginia CWP Fund v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 1, 2017
Citation: 691 F. App'x 110
Docket Number: 16-1923
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.