32:T494,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"West v. Shackelford, 74 S.E. 1079","datePublished":"1912-05-15","legislationDate":"1912-05-15","citation":"West v. Shackelford, 74 S.E. 1079 (Ga. 1912)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Georgia","description":"Read the full text of West v. Shackelford (West v. Shackelford, 74 S.E. 1079 (Ga. 1912)). This legal opinion, filed in 1912-05-15, from the Supreme Court of Georgia discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/west-v-shackelford--5578457"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/west-v-shackelford--5578457","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, West v. Shackelford, Supreme Court of Georgia, West v. Shackelford, 74 S.E. 1079 (Ga. 1912)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T46f, Atkinson, J.

1. When a judgment refusing an interlocutory injunction is brought to the Supreme Court for review, the trial judge is authorized to grant a supersedeas upon such terms as may by him be deemed necessary to preserve the rights of the parties until the judgment of the Supreme Court can be had. Civil Code, § 5502; Stokes v. Stokes, 126 Ga. 804 (55 S. E. 1023). It is left, however, in the sound legal discretion of the judge to grant or refuse it. See Savannah, Florida *164& Western Ry. Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 113 Ga. 916 (39 S. E. 399).

May 15, 1912.

This writ of error was upon the refusal of a supersedeas in the case next preceding.

2. The judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a supersedeas in this case. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.