History
  • No items yet
midpage
West v. Roberts
68 C.C.A. 58
5th Cir.
1905
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

On the trial in the lower court each party requested the court to instruct the jury to return a verdict in his favor, and thereby each affirmed there was no disputed question of fact which could operate to deflect or control the question of law. See Beuttell v. Magone, 157 U. S. 157, 15 Sup. Ct. 566, 39 L. Ed. 654. The trial judge gave the peremptory instruction in favor of the defendant, and therein followed McDade v. The Bossier Levee Board, 109 Ra. 627, 33 South. 628, and Hall v. Revee Board, 111 Ra. 913, 35 South. 976.

The ruling of the trial judge was correct, and the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: West v. Roberts
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 15, 1905
Citation: 68 C.C.A. 58
Docket Number: No. 1,366
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.