History
  • No items yet
midpage
West v. Galloway's Adm'r
33 Ala. 306
Ala.
1858
Check Treatment
STONE, J.—

In considering the motion to enter judgment nunc pro tunc, the primary court should have regarded only the record evidence.—Thompson v. Miller, 2 Stew. 470.

The evidence adduced was record evidence, and it authorized the correction of the judgment nunc pro nunc. Thompson v. Miller, supra; Brown v. Bartlett, 2 Ala. 29; Spence v. Rutledge, 11 Ala. 590,

The judgment being regular, and that judgment relating back to the time it was first rendered, it must be affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: West v. Galloway's Adm'r
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 15, 1858
Citation: 33 Ala. 306
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.