History
  • No items yet
midpage
West v. Barton-Malow Co.
395 Mich. 902
Mich.
1975
Check Treatment

Defendants-appellees’ motion to take additional testimony is also considered and the same is hereby granted. The case is hereby remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board for the taking of additional testimony (see Rule 20 of the Rules of Practice of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board). Following the receipt of said testimony, the board shall make findings of fact and law, and thereafter either party may file an application for leave to appeal *903therefrom directly to this Court.

Kelman, Loria, Downing, Schneider & Simpson for plaintiff-appellant. LeVasseur, Werner, Mitseff & Brown for defendant-appellee.

Reported at 394 Mich 334.

M. S. Coleman, and Lindemer, JJ., would grant rehearing. T. G. Kavanagh, C. J., would deny rehearing. Swainson, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: West v. Barton-Malow Co.
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 10, 1975
Citation: 395 Mich. 902
Docket Number: Docket No. 55404
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.