Wertz v. H. W. Collender Co.
6 Sadler 361 | Pa. | 1887
It may be conceded that the line is not sharply defined between the cases which hold that a chattel held under a bailment and conditional sale will be liable to execution as the property of the bailee and the other cases which declare that the property of the vendor shall not be so liable. We think, however, this case was correctly decided under the authority of Rowe v. Sharp, 51 Pa. 26; therefore,
Judgment affirmed.
