History
  • No items yet
midpage
Werner v. Shilare
237 A.D. 811
N.Y. App. Div.
1932
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.; Merrell, J., dissents on the ground that the directed verdict was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence, that the testimony of the plaintiff’s witness Klein was clear and reasonable and was unshaken upon cross-examination, whereas the testimony of the defendants’ witness Hollander was evasive and, in several instances, as to material matters, contained contradictions of the testimony which he had given in his examination before trial, and, therefore, he was unworthy of belief.

Case Details

Case Name: Werner v. Shilare
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1932
Citation: 237 A.D. 811
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.