No exception was taken to the rulings on the admission of evidence nor to the order dismissing the action. There was no motion for a new trial and hence no assignment of error in the court below.
It is now well settled in this state that error, if any, in a ruling on the trial may not be reviewed on appeal from a judgment if appellant did not take an exception to the ruling on the trial or
assign it as error in a motion for a new trial. Winning v. Timm, 210 Minn. 270" court="Minn." date_filed="1941-05-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/winning-v-timm-3508451?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3508451">210 Minn. 270, 297 N.W. 739" court="Minn." date_filed="1941-05-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/a-y-mcdonald-mfg-co-v-read-3511089?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3511089">297 N.W. 739. See, also, Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170" court="Minn." date_filed="1945-06-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/ranum-v-swenson-3506629?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3506629">220 Minn. 170, 19 N.W.2d 327" court="Minn." date_filed="1945-06-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/ranum-v-swenson-3506629?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3506629">19 N.W.2d 327.
Therefore, the questions raised by plaintiff are not properly before us.
Affirmed.