Welsh v. Potts

Apr 11, 1924
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Minturn, Kaijsctt, Black, Campbell, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Katzenbaci-i, Clark, JJ. 2.