History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wells v. Leitmann
60 Mo. App. 37
Mo. Ct. App.
1894
Check Treatment
Bond, J.

The petition in this ease is for the establishment of a private road over certain real estate. The case was heard" in the county court, where judgment was entered as prayed. It was taken thence to the circuit court by certiorari, where the judgment of the county court was quashed, from which decision an appeal was taken to this court.

We are without jurisdiction of this cause. Exclusive jurisdiction is vested by the constitution in the supreme court of “cases involving the title to real estate.” The supreme court has recently decided that a suit to set aside a judgment in condemnation proceedings; on the ground “that the part of it adjudging costs against him (plaintiff) was procured by fraud,” *38did involve the title to real estate in the constitutional sense, and that an appeal from a judgment therein would only lie to that tribunal. State ex rel. Railroad v. Rombauer. The ground of the foregoing holding was that such a proceeding, while it only transferred an easement in the land condemned, nevertheless deprived the owner of his right to the exclusive possession thereof, and thus took from him one of the essential elements of perfect title.

It is obvious that the rule thus, announced must govern the present case, which will, therefore, be transferred to the supreme court.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Wells v. Leitmann
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 4, 1894
Citation: 60 Mo. App. 37
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.