Wells v. BennettWells v. Bennett
Oct 27, 1926
Versions:135 A. 14615 Stock. 358100 N.J. Eq. 3581926 N.J. LEXIS 569
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 15.
For reversal — Hone.