Wellington v. State, 52 Ark. 266

Wellington v. State

52 Ark. 266 | Ark. | 1889

Per Curiam.

Trespass: Hunting, etc. If the charge of the court demanded of the appellants a greater degree of diligence than the law sanctions in ascertaining the boundaries of the land upon which they had permission to hunt, it did not prejudice them, because there is no evidence in the abstract tending to show that they used any diligence at all. Clark v. State, 50 Ark., 570.

Braithwait was the owner of the land within the meaning of the act. Affirm.