History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chemical Corp.
4 N.J. 115
| N.J. | 1950
|
Check Treatment
4 N.J. 115 (1950)
71 A.2d 629

MAX WEISSBARD, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
POTTER DRUG & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 27, 1950.
Decided March 6, 1950.

Mr. Sandford Freedman argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder & Kaufman, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph H. Stamler argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Lorentz & Stamler, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Freund in the Superior Court, Chancery Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 5.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chemical Corp.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 6, 1950
Citation: 4 N.J. 115
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.