Weinfeld v. Funk, Appeal, 135

Appeal, 135 | Pa. | Apr 24, 1941

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. In its opinion, the court states: "After a careful review of the entire case, we reached the firm conclusion that justice demanded that plaintiff's motion for a new trial be sustained." We have uniformly held that under such circumstances we will not review the action of the court below: Reese v. PittsburghRys. Co., 336 Pa. 299" date_filed="1939-10-03" court="Pa." case_name="Reese v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.">336 Pa. 299, 9 A.2d 394" date_filed="1939-10-03" court="Pa." case_name="Reese v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.">9 A.2d 394; Kerr v. Hofer, 341 Pa. 47" date_filed="1941-01-31" court="Pa." case_name="Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)">341 Pa. 47,17 A.2d 886" date_filed="1941-01-31" court="Pa." case_name="Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)">17 A.2d 886.

The order of the court below is affirmed.