History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weinfeld v. Funk
342 Pa. 160
Pa.
1941
Check Treatment

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. In its opinion, the court states: "After a careful review of the entire case, we reached the firm conclusion that justice demanded that plaintiff's motion for a new trial be sustained." We have uniformly held that under such circumstances we will not review the action of the court below: Reese v. PittsburghRys. Co., 336 Pa. 299, 9 A.2d 394; Kerr v. Hofer, 341 Pa. 47,17 A.2d 886.

The order of the court below is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Weinfeld v. Funk
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 24, 1941
Citation: 342 Pa. 160
Docket Number: Appeal, 135
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.