History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weidmann v. . Borden
114 N.E. 1075
| NY | 1916
|
Check Treatment

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO and POUND, JJ.; WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., is of the opinion that the evidence as to the value was inadmissible, and he concurs upon the ground that the error was not harmful under the circumstances.

Case Details

Case Name: Weidmann v. . Borden
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 21, 1916
Citation: 114 N.E. 1075
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.