131 N.Y.S. 408 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1911
This action was brought to recover on three promissory notes made by the defendant to the order of the plaintiff. The mak
The only basis for the order for the examination of the defendant is the plaintiff’s affidavit showing the formal requirements, and that the examination is desired before trial “ for the reason that the testimony of the said defendant is material and necessary for the plaintiff in the prosecution of said action, in that the matters set up by the defendant as a special defense, if true, are wholly within the personal knowledge of the defendant.” On the trial the defendant will have the burdemof establishing the allegations of his separate defense and it will doubtless be necessary for him to take the stand as a witness, There is nothing to show that without'the examination the plaintiff is in danger of having the defense established without an opportunity to disprove it by the testimony of the defendant'; norx does it even appear that the plaintiff has any ground for believing that the testimony of the defendant will establish the falsity of his own allegations of fraud contained in his verified answer. The order for the examination of the defendant in these circumstances was not warranted and should have been vacated.
It follows, therefore, that the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs: and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Olarke and Miller, JJ., concurred..
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
