History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weed v. Gay
160 F. 695
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1908
Check Treatment
PLATT, District Judge.

I think that paragraph 8 of the bill may fairly be construed as alleging that the defendants are selling devices which infringe the patent, and are copying complainant’s circulars about the patented device for an unfair purpose.

The proofs must conform, to such contruction, and to make assurance doubly sure, let the words “under said letters patent” be placed as an ending to paragraph 8. This may be done without costs to either party.

The demurrer being disposed of let the pleadings go forward in the regular way.

Case Details

Case Name: Weed v. Gay
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
Date Published: May 4, 1908
Citation: 160 F. 695
Docket Number: No. 1,259
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.