History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weed v. Brazill
192 A.D. 71
N.Y. App. Div.
1920
Check Treatment
Smith, J.:

It follows from the reasoning in Brazill v. Weed (192 App. Div. 66) that this order was properly issued, and should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Dowling, Laughlin and Merrell, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case Details

Case Name: Weed v. Brazill
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 14, 1920
Citation: 192 A.D. 71
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.