Wechsler v. WechslerWechsler v. Wechsler
The court‘s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). The evidence warranted the inference that appellant damaged the car in question, as well as the inference that he intended the natural consequence of his acts (see Matter of Joshua F., 309 AD2d 1012 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.