midpage

Webster v. RoeWebster v. Roe

New York Court of Appeals
Nov 24, 1925
Versions:241 N.Y. 570
150 N.E. 559
1925 N.Y. LEXIS 652

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.; His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo and Lehman, ‍‌​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍JJ., concur on ground that plaintiff under complaint and reply cannot recover on note.

Case Details

Case Name: Webster v. Roe
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 24, 1925
Citations: 241 N.Y. 570; 150 N.E. 559; 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 652
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In