delivered the opinion of this court.
The jurisdiction conferred by the General Assembly of Maryland, on the cоmmissioners of Baltimore county, in regard to the opening and shutting up оf public roads is a special limited jurisdiction; and from their decisions upon the subject, no appeal will lie to the county cоurt unless provided for by legislative enactment. If such right of appеal from the proceedings of the commissioners he given by the legislature to the county court, its judgments thereon cannot be reviewed on appeal to this court, unless the latter right of apрeal be in like manner given. But if no such right of appeal be conferred on the county court, then its judgments unwarrantably pronouncеd on the subject, may by appeal he reviewed and reversеd in this court. In deciding therefore on the motion to dismiss the appеal before us, our inquiries are confined to two facts; to wit: has thе legislature vested in the county court an appellate рower over the proceedings of the commissioners, in oрening and shutting up public roads in Baltimore county, and from the exerсise of such appellate powers given to the county сourt, has the legislature given a right of appeal to this tribunal? For
Assuming the existence of the appellate power exerted by the county court in this case, for the correction of any errors or irregularities in its proceedings under the same, no appeal lies to this court. See the cases of the Wilmington and Susquehanna Rail Road Company vs. Joseph Condon, 8 Gill and Johns. 443. The Savage Manufacturing Company vs.
The appeal in this case, to this court, is dismissed.
APPEAL DISMISSED.