History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weber v. Timlin
37 Minn. 274
Minn.
1887
Check Treatment
Gtleillan, C. J.1

The main question in this case — the only one that the parties are particularly interested in having decided — is disposed of in the case of Nichols v. Walter, ante, p. 264, the opinion in which is filed at the same time with this. But although the act of the legislature under which the defendants, as county commissioners, are charged by the complaint with being about to order an election or a removal of the county-seat, is invalid, yet the complaint does not make a case for an injunction, for the statute providing a mode for contesting elections furnishes a full remedy should the election be held. The order will be reversed, without costs.

Order reversed.

Berry, J., because of illness, took no part in this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Weber v. Timlin
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jul 25, 1887
Citation: 37 Minn. 274
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.