History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weber v. Colliers International Group, Inc.
2:25-cv-00162
D. Utah
Jun 3, 2025
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 2:25-cv-00162-DBB-DBP Document 35 Filed 06/03/25 PageID.443 Page 1

of 2 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH John Weber et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 2:25-cv-00162-DBB-DBP Colliers International Group, Inc. et al., District Judge David Barlow

Defendants. Chief Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead

Plaintiffs move the court for an extension of time of 60 days, to serve their Amended Complaint upon the following Defendants: Colliers International Group, Inc.; Colliers International Holdings (USA), Inc.; Kevin Long; Millcreek Commercial Properties LLC; Millrock Investment Fund 1, LLC; Millrock Investment Fund 1 Management, LLC; Brent Smith; Thomas Smith; Lew Cramer; Jerald Adam Long; KGL Real Estate Development, PLLC; KGL Advisors, LLC; Steve Caton; SARC Draper, LLC; ADP-Millcreek 2, LLC; ADP-Millcreek 3, LLC; Matthew Hawkins; Gil Borok; David Josker; Smart Cove; GTR Holdings; Long Holdings; Robert M. Levenson; and Blackacre 1031 Exchange Services. [1] The court will grant the motion.

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff must serve their complaint on the defendants within 90 days. However, upon a showing of good cause for failing to meet that deadline, the “court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” [2] Here, Plaintiffs set forth the factual background regarding their efforts to serve certain Defendants. For example, Plaintiffs note efforts to obtain waivers of service, reaching out to counsel, and attempts to *2 Case 2:25-cv-00162-DBB-DBP Document 35 Filed 06/03/25 PageID.444 Page 2

of 2 personally serve certain individuals without success. [3] The court finds Plaintiffs have set forth good cause under Rule 4(m) for an extension.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Amended Complaint upon the Defendants named in the respective motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are given an additional 60 days from the date of this order to effectuate service of the Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 3 June 2025. Dustin B. Pead United States Magistrate Judge

[1] ECF No. 33.

[2] Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

[3] See Motion p. 4-7. 2

Case Details

Case Name: Weber v. Colliers International Group, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, D. Utah
Date Published: Jun 3, 2025
Docket Number: 2:25-cv-00162
Court Abbreviation: D. Utah
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.