History
  • No items yet
midpage
Webber v. Osgood
68 N.H. 234
| N.H. | 1894
|
Check Treatment

At the time of the attachment, Brown had the title to the organ and the right to its possession, — the plaintiff having failed to make payments in accordance with her agreement. Bailey v. Colby, 34 N.H. 29; McFarland v. Farmer, 42 N.H. 386, 391; Proctor v. Tilton, 65 N.H. 3, 4. The surrender of the possession to Hutchinson, to whom Brown had sold and transferred his title and right of possession, was a surrender to *Page 235 the owner and a discharge of the defendant's duty. Littlefield v. Davis,62 N.H. 492. The plaintiff, having no title and no right of possession, has no cause of complaint on account of such surrender.

Judgment for the defendant.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Webber v. Osgood
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1894
Citation: 68 N.H. 234
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.