History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weaver v. Painter
2 Sadler 395
Pa.
1886
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

There was clearly no error in refusing to strike from the record a judgment regular on its face. Under the evidence, the opening of the judgment to the extent of $50, the sum in dispute, is certainly quite as much relief as the plaintiffs in error are entitled to in equity.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Weaver v. Painter
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 10, 1886
Citation: 2 Sadler 395
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.