History
  • No items yet
midpage
Weaver Organization, Inc. v. Manette
34 N.Y.2d 923
NY
1974
Check Treatment

Memobaxdum. The order of the Appellate Division, First Department, should be modified in accordance with the following memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.

*925We agree with the Appellate Division that on this record P & F Industries, Inc. was entitled to rescission and complete restitution. On the cross appeal P & F seeks restitution from the appellants (Alfred Manette, Sidney Manette, and Irving Levinson) of the money advanced to Stuyvesant. The Appellate Division held that P & F should recover from Stuyvesant alone. On this point we disagree. The contract between P & F and the appellants obligated P & F to advance $150,000 to Stuyvesant as third-party beneficiary. After the money was paid P & F rescinded the agreement because of material misrepresentations. Under these circumstances P & F was also entitled to recover from the appellants the money paid to Stuyvesant on their behalf. (See Restatement, Restitution, § 17, Comment E.)

Accordingly the order of the Appellate Division, First Department, is modified to the extent of directing the appellants, Alfred Manette, Sidney Manette and Irving Levinson, to restore to P & F the amount advanced to Stuyvesant and in all other respects the order is affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Rabin concur; Judge Stevens taking no part.

Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Weaver Organization, Inc. v. Manette
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 10, 1974
Citation: 34 N.Y.2d 923
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.